Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ya-Hsuan Lee vs Quinn Gleason Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lee vs Gleason analysis and find out who is favored!
Ya-Hsuan Lee vs Quinn Gleason Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Gleason
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lee has won 43.83% of points on their second serve, while Gleason has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lee, in recent form, has won 60.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gleason has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lee has saved 50.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gleason has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lee has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 24/ 21), with Gleason winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17), where as Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lee winning 1 times and Gleason being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Gleason winning 1. The last match between Lee and Gleason was at the Hana Bank Korea Open - Seoul, 07-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Ya-Hsuan Lee getting the victory 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lee and Gleason have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lee winning 1 times and Gleason 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lee winning 1, and Gleason 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lee has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.24 while Gleason has played against players with an average rank of 286.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lee has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gleason has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lee has converted 51.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gleason has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
365
Rank
186
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
323
High
29
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (311-218)
Career Total W/L
55% (153-125)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$12,910
Career Prize Money
$4,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ya-Hsuan Lee vs Quinn Gleason For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lee VS Gleason
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ya-Hsuan Lee | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:38 | 2:25:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (44/86) | 78% (70/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (31/44) | 53% (37/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (17/42) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 86% (6/7) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (43/90) | 44% (38/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ya-Hsuan Lee | Quinn Gleason |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (43/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (390/373) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 146 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.94 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1486/2369) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (910/1486) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (387/883) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (152/295) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1133/2402) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (19/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Ya-Hsuan Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Miho Kuramochi
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
112)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Quinn Gleason Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quinn Gleason
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Quinn Gleason
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Quinn Gleason
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Quinn Gleason
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lee Vs Gleason Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lee are available here and Gleason photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
